821 So. 2d 812 - Robert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Peterson v. State · Miranda v. United States · 615 So. 2d 590 - Edwards v. State · 421 So. 2d 1025 - Oates v. State · Isaac v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“but nothing in Rule 3.10 of the Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court sets a specific procedure for conducting the poll. Id. ¶ 28. In summary, I find no precedent holding that the denial of a properly exercised request for a jury poll may be found harmless. It is true that the timing of the request in this case is suspect. Yet I also find that the judge did not”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McLarty v. State“to give each juror an opportunity, before the verdict is recorded, to declare in open court his assent to the verdict which the foreman has returned,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McLarty v. State“inquire if either party desires to poll the jury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McLarty v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.