Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 SO2D 864 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2013

4 state decisions

2020022010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. State · 684 So. 2d 625 - Hunter v. State · 573 So. 2d 657 - Turner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judge is required to disqualify himself if a reasonable person, knowing all the circumstances, would harbor doubts about his impartiality.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that a judge, sworn to administer impartial justice, is qualified and unbiased.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.