Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

821 S.W.2d 124

Cheffey v. Cheffey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1991

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1991-12-31

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2002

7 state decisions

Relies on State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. · Foger v. Johnson · Shafer v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant Richard Cheffey seeks to appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court on November 6, 1990. Respondent has filed a meritorious motion to dismiss the appeal. The judgment was entered pursuant to the agreement of the parties. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

¶2A judgment entered pursuant to an agreement of the parties is not a judicial determination of rights and cannot be appealed. Shafer v. Auto. Club Inter-Ins. Exchange, 778 S.W.2d 395, 400[5] (Mo.App.1989); Roberts v. Roberts, 515 S.W.2d 805, 806[2] (Mo.App.1974); State ex rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Cos. Co., 430 S.W.2d 642, 645[7,8] (Mo.App.1968); Foger v. Johnson, 362 S.W.2d 763, 764-765[2] (Mo.App.1962). A party is estopped or waives his right to appeal when a judgment is entered at his request. State ex rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., supra, at 645.

¶3Appeal dismissed.

All concur.
/821/sw2d/124 · .json · Public domain