Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 SW2D 742 - State v. Como

State v. Como’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Hensley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “meant it was either a newly registered vehicle or it could be an unregistered vehicle or an altered license plate. At some point Wilson turned on his spotlight and perhaps his overhead light. John Edward Como emerged from the vehicle's driver position and approached the police car. The officer got out of his car, asked Mr. Como”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “of the vehicle by pulling up behind it and turning on the emergency lights. As we indicated earlier, Officer Wilson described reasonable articulable facts for the initial intrusion. Our reading of the law rendered in the cases cited in Dickey, supra, leads us to conclude that once an officer expresses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in criminal cases. The following is taken from Dickey v. State, 716 S.W.2d 499 (Tex.Crim.App.1986): It is settled law that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.