Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 S.W.2d 804 - Schambon v. Commonwealth

Schambon v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2014

20 state decisions

70199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Benton · Epperson v. Commonwealth · Stanford v. Commonwealth · Eubank v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may permit an indictment, information, complaint or citation to be amended any time before verdict or finding if no additional or different offense is charged and the substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced. If justice requires, however, the court shall grant the defendant a continuance when such an amendment is permitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Two (2) or more offenses ... may be charged in the same indictment ... in a separate count for each offense, if the offenses are of the same or similar character or are based on the same acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he decision to join or sever is within the sound discretion of the trial court and an exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clear abuse and prejudice are shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.