Zebroski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockett v. Ohio · Ring v. Arizona · Wainwright v. Witt · Ake v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“competent evidence supports the court's findings of fact and whether its conclusions of law are not erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anker v. State“must make specific allegations of actual prejudice and substantiate them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anker v. State“fell below an objective standard of reasonableness”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baynum v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.