Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 A2D 1074 - In Re Uwazih

In Re Uwazih’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on In re J.D.C. · Don't Tear It Down, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corp. · Teachey v. Carver · In Re Orshansky · In Re Estate of Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “incapacitated individual means an adult whose ability to receive and evaluate information effectively or to communicate decisions is impaired to such an extent that he or she lacks the capacity to manage all or some of his or her financial resources or to meet all or some essential requirements for his or her physical health, safety, habilitation, or therapeutic needs without court-ordered assistance or the appointment of a guardian or conservator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.