Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 F.2d 1518 - Campbell v. Bowen

Campbell v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

822 F.2d 1518 · 1987

Citation profile

140
cited by 140 later decisions
April 2017
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 68 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Williams v. Bowen (1988), Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1991)

39 federal appellate · 68 district ·

6101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Bowen v. Yuckert · Broadbent v. Harris · Talbot v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence that a reasonable mind might accept to support the conclusion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “more than a scintilla, but less than a preponderance,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) The term 'disability' means-- 21 "(A) inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months; ... 22 .... 23 "(2) For purposes of paragraph (1)(A)-- 24 "(A) An individual shall be determined to be under a disability only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.