Struempler v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
822 F.2d 40 · 1987
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Shannon v. Ford Motor Co. (1996), Hamilton v. Schriro (1996)
22 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Lanning v. Heckler · Allred v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not a flat rule but rather a matter of prudence and discretion,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen an issue was actually decided in the trial court, even though not expressly raised by the parties, the rule against consideration of the question on appeal loses a good deal of its force. It is not unfair to a trial court for an appellate court to decide a question that the trial court actually reached in its opinion....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless all of the evidence is so strongly against the claimant's position that proper allocation of proof would not have changed the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trundle v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.