Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 F.2d 806 - McCormick v. Security State Bank

McCormick v. Security State Bank’s Empirical Analysis

822 F.2d 806 · 1987

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
May 2015
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Scott v. E W R, Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. Tveten (1988)

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Lovell v. Mixon · Bateman City National Bank of Fort Smith Arkansas v. C Bateman · Armstrong v. Lindberg · City National Bank of Fort Smith v. Bateman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the act complained of was done at a time subsequent to one year before the date of the filing of the petition; (2) with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud a creditor or an officer of the estate charged with custody of property under the Bankruptcy Code; (3) that the act was that of the debtor or his duly authorized agent; and (4) that the act consisted of transferring, removing, destroying or concealing any of the debtor’s property, or permitting any of these acts to be done.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “1. that a concealment of property has occurred; 2. that the property was property of the estate; 3. that the act complained of was done within one year of the filing of the petition; 4.that the concealment was done with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud a creditor of the estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.