Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 F.2d 812 - Malek v. Camp

Malek v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis

822 F.2d 812 · 1987

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Bostic v. Carlson (1989), Gwinn v. Awmiller (2004)

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Marino v. United States · Ward v. Village of Monroeville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the offered testimony was not reasonably necessary to resolve the conflict and would cause undue delay”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Prison officials must have the necessary discretion to keep the hearing within reasonable limits and to refuse to call witnesses that may create a risk of reprisal or undermine authority, as well as to limit access to other inmates to collect statements or to compile other documentary evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whether a complaint states a cause of action is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. On review, this court must presume that the factual allegations of the complaint are true and accord all reasonable inferences from those facts to the non-moving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.