Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 F.3d 1196 - In re Robinson

In re Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

822 F.3d 1196 · 2016

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on 135 S. Ct. 2551 - Johnson v. United States · Welch v. United States · Dodd v. United States · United States v. Matchett · United States v. Lockley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ACCA gives three definitions of “violent felony.” First, § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) covers any offense that "has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another." This is known as the “elements clause.” Second, § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) covers any offense that “is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” The first 9 words of that subsection are called the “enumerated crimes clause,” and the last 13 are called the "residual clause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.