Koprowski v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
822 F.3d 248 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4126 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 42 U.S.C. § 233 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (Attendant Allowance Adjustment Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8107
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Estelle v. Gamble · Ex Parte: Edward T Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only in exceptional cases or particular circumstances or when the rule [of party presentation] would produce a plain miscarriage of justice do we exercise our discretion to entertain arguments not raised [by the parties.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.