Carter v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
822 F.3d 47 · 2016
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based solely on the allegations of the complaint or the complaint and exhibits attached to it”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“facts that affirmatively and plausibly suggest that [the plaintiff] has standing to sue.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Alternatively, a defendant is permitted to make a fact-based Rule 12(b)(1) motion, proffering evidence beyond the complaint and its exhibits.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.