Rishor v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis
822 F.3d 482 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Faretta v. California · Erickson v. Pardus · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Koon v. United States · Green v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the repeated filing of habeas petitions that attack the prisoner's underlying conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turner v. Baker“newly discovered or previously unavailable evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“intervening change in the controlling law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.