Salazar v. King’s Empirical Analysis
822 F.3d 61 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1087 · 20 U.S.C. § 1091 · 20 U.S.C. § 1098A · 31 U.S.C. § 3711 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Gerstein v. Pugh · Bennett v. Spear · Heckler v. Chaney · Sosna v. Iowa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be one by which 'rights or obligations have been determined,' or from which 'legal consequences will flow.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts look to the statutory text, the agency's regulations, and informal agency guidance that govern the agency's challenged action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is committed to agency discretion by law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.