Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 F.3d 798 - In re Mole

In re Mole’s Empirical Analysis

822 F.3d 798 · 2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health · 646 So. 2d 343 - In Re Quaid · In the Matter Of: Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc. · McCuin v. Texas Power & Light Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Eastern District of Louisiana Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “convinced that the district court has misconstrued its own rules,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “observe scrupulously its own rules of disciplinary procedure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.