Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 FSUPP2D 1125 - David v. Oxy USA, Inc.

David v. Oxy USA, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2202

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “plaintiffs have failed to show that money damages would not be sufficient to compensate any potential future injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “compensated after the fact by money damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.