Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Edwards v. Arizona · Kirby v. Illinois · Davis v. United States · Wrinkles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the PCR court orders the cause submitted by affidavit under Rule 1(9)(b), it is the court's prerogative to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required, along with the petitioner's personal presence, to achieve a 'full and fair determination of the issues raised[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kuhn v. State“The argument must contain the contentions of the appellant on the issues presented supported by cogent reasoning. Each contention must be supported by citations to the authorities, statutes, and the Appendix or parts of the Record on Appeal relied on.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State“To establish prejudice, a defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mills v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.