Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 N.E.2d 193 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Edwards v. Arizona · Kirby v. Illinois · Davis v. United States · Wrinkles v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the PCR court orders the cause submitted by affidavit under Rule 1(9)(b), it is the court's prerogative to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required, along with the petitioner's personal presence, to achieve a 'full and fair determination of the issues raised[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The argument must contain the contentions of the appellant on the issues presented supported by cogent reasoning. Each contention must be supported by citations to the authorities, statutes, and the Appendix or parts of the Record on Appeal relied on.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To establish prejudice, a defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.