Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 N.E.2d 285 - Parker v. State

Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meeker v. Indiana Parole Board · Hannis v. Deuth · State v. Suggs · Thomas v. State · Wickliffe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Exeept as provided in subsection (d), when a person imprisoned for a felony completes his fixed term of imprisonment, less the credit time he has earned with respect to that term, he shall be: (1) released on parole for not more than twenty-four (24) months, as determined by the parole board; (2) discharged upon a finding by the committing court that the person was assigned to a community transition program and may be discharged without the requirement of parole; or (8) released to the committing court if his sentence included a period of probation. (b). Except as provided in subsection (d), a person released on parole remains on parole from the date of his release until his fixed term expires, unless bis parole is revoked or he is discharged from that term by the parole board. In any event, if his parole is not revoked, the parole board shall discharge him after the period set under subsection (a) or the expiration of the person's fixed term, whichever . is shorter. [[Image here]]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Meeker was ordered to serve two dealing convictions concurrently in 1991. In 1995, Meeker was released on parole. In 1996, Meeker’s parole was revoked after he was convicted of several alcohol related offenses, and he was ordered to serve the balance of the two dealing sentences. In 1998, the parole board decided Meeker should be “turned over” to serve the sentences on the alcohol related offenses. In 2000, Meeker was released on parole again. The 1991 convictions were used as the basis of the parole. In 2001, the parole board again revoked Meeker’s parole and reinstated the remaining sentences on the 1991 dealing convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.