State v. Scruggs’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Mathiason · Howes v. Fields · State v. Ulvinen · State v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subdivision 1. Aiding, abetting; liability. A person is criminally hable for a crime committed by another if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime. Subd. 2. Expansive liability. A person liable under subdivision 1 is also liable for any other crime committed in pursuance of the intended crime if reasonably foreseeable by the person as a probable consequence of committing or attempting to commit the crime intended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Longo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.