Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 N.W.2d 851 - State v. Kirkpatrick

State v. Kirkpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Fairgo v. Thompson · State v. Olson · State v. Blue · State v. Smith · Meads v. Best Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To successfully challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, a defendant must show there is no reasonable inference of guilt when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. ... In deciding whether there is sufficient evidence, we do not resolve conflicts in the evidence nor do we weigh the credibility of the witnesses. We determine only whether there is competent evidence which could have allowed the jury to draw an inference reasonably tending to prove guilt and fairly warranting a conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.