Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 P.2d 369 - Flores v. State

Flores v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Frias v. State · Hicklin v. State · King v. State · Zanetti v. State · Laing v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Withdrawal of plea of guilty or nolo contendere. — A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere may be made only before sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended; but to correct manifest injustice the court after sentence may set aside the judgment or conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “After sentencing, a defendant must justify the withdrawal of a guilty plea by showing manifest injustice. The determination of such a motion is addressed to the discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.