Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 P.2d 764 - Prows v. State

Prows v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Hall v. Utah State Department of Corrections (2001), Educators Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (1995)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions

1901991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's Hospital · Colman v. Utah State Land Board · Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co. · Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. Anderson · Union Bank v. Swenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only where it clearly appears that the plaintiff or plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief under the facts alleged or under any state of facts they could prove to support their claim.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true and consider all reasonable inferences to be drawn from those facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is well recognized that the performance of a duty imposed by law is insufficient consideration to support a contract. See, e.g., Hale v. Brewster, 81 N.M. 342 , 467 P.2d 8, 11 (1970) (court-appointed attorney had duty to accept payment from court for representation as sole compensation; if client's note was given to attorney as fee for services, attorney was already bound to perform and client had a valid defense to action by attorney on the note); Gragg v. James, 452 P.2d 579, 587 (Okla.1969) (oral modification to contract relieving defendant of responsibility must be supported by additional consideration to be enforceable); Walden v. Backus, 81 Nev. 634 , 408 P.2d 712, 714 (1965) (buyer's relinquishment of premises insufficient to support accord where buyer was already bound under sale agreement to return premises); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 78 (1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.