People v. Rader’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably In Re: Robert B Surrick, In re Surrick (2003)
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Palermo v. United States · United States v. Benjamin · B & B Asphalt Co. v. T. S. McShane Co. · State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Holscher · Ackerman v. Schwartz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The element of scienter is shown with respect to a violation of [the predecessor to Colo. RPC 8.4(c)] when it is established that the attorney deliberately closed his eyes to facts he had a duty to see or recklessly stated as facts things of which he was ignorant.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it must be shown that the lawyer possessed a culpable mental state greater than simple negli-genee”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Fisher · People v. Mascarenas“conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Fisher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.