822 So. 2d 1100 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State · 749 So. 2d 110 - Floyd v. City of Crystal Springs · 606 So. 2d 1132 - Parker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court is limited in reversing a trial court's actions regarding discovery issues. We may reverse a trial judge's ruling regarding discovery issues only if we find an abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“You are the sole judges of the facts in this case. You may consider the alleged confession in light of the manner in which it was obtained and give it such weight and credibility as you think it is entitled. Unless you believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged confession was made by the Defendant both truthfully and of his own free will, and was not the result of any hope of regard or leniency, then you must disregard the alleged confession to the extent that these facts tend to discredit it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.