Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 SO2D 447 - Crapps v. State

Crapps v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 600 So. 2d 1088 - Drayton v. State · 658 So. 2d 511 - Banks v. State · Crapps v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Because [appellant's] Rule 32 petition was not filed in the form required by . . . Rule 32.6(b), [Ala.R.Crim.P.], the petition was due to be returned to the appellant with instructions to file a verified petition in the proper form. Therefore, jurisdiction of this case is transferred to the trial court with instructions to set aside its order denying the petition and to return the petition to [appellant] so that he can have the opportunity to file a petition in the proper form.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.