Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

822 So. 2d 542

Tunsil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-07-24

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2018

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-07-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Having reviewed the entire record herein, we conclude that defendant should have been afforded the benefit of counsel at the evidentiary hearing on his motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for appointment of the public defender and a new hearing.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/822/so2d/542 · .json · Public domain