822 So. 2d 796 - State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “which considers an informant's veracity, reliability and basis of knowledge as highly relevant in determining the value of an informant's tip. Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213 , 214, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 2320, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) ; State v. Nelson , 02-65 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/26/02), 822 So.2d 796 , 801, writ denied , 02-2090 (La. 2/21/03), 837 So.2d 627 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 248 So. 3d 665 - State v. Clay · 860 So. 2d 51 - State v. Tovar

2. “Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the . . . district attorney . . . in argument, refers directly or indirectly to . . . [t]he failure of the defendant to testify in his own defense[.]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 841 So. 2d 952 - State v. Davis · 985 So. 2d 234 - State v. Jones

3. “(2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible;”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 841 So. 2d 952 - State v. Davis