Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 So. 2d 823 - State v. Percy

822 So. 2d 823 - State v. Percy’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Epps v. West · State v. Shapiro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal, the reviewing court "does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events." ... Rather, the court must evaluate the evidence in a light most favorable to the state and determine whether the possible alternative is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (emphasis in original, citation omitted). State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), 772 So.2d 78 , 83”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.