822 So. 2d 975 - Smith v. Orman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 652 So. 2d 1113 - Brooks v. Brooks · 612 So. 2d 1092 - C & C TRUCKING CO. v. Smith · 642 So. 2d 909 - Denson v. George · 797 So. 2d 869 - O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. Millette · 666 So. 2d 739 - Dew v. Langford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court finds that during the seven (7) day trial the evidence firmly established that Margaret misappropriated partnership funds and received improper gifts from her mother. The evidence firmly established that the misappropriation of partnership funds and [Margie Allen’s] personal assets were willfully and wrongfully taken and in reckless disregard for the rights of Dixie. Margaret’s defense that the funds received represented gifts from her mother was contradicted by circumstances and was improbable and incomplete. The fiduciary relationship that Margaret shared with her mother and the partnership was clearly established from 1998 on up to the death of [Margie Allen] given the take-over by Margaret of her mother’s personal business as well as the partnership business. The total dependence of [Margie Allen] on Margaret because of [Margie Allen’s] declining health further reinforces the fiduciary relationship. Margaret owed a special duty to Dixie and her mother to properly manage the partnership assets. She was required to exercise good faith, and she failed to do so. Margaret allowed [Margie Allen] to waste partnership assets at a time when she knew her mother was suffering from dementia, which included impaired judgment and memory. The acts of Margaret in receiving improper gifts and misappropriating partnership funds was no accident. It was consciously and deliberately done on her part, and she profited from, these acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.