Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 822 SW2D 302 - Wolma v. Gonzalez

Wolma v. Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 285th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Hughey v. United States · Begier v. Internal Revenue Service · TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell · Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Schwalb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A post-judgment order disposing of all matters placed before the trial court in the post-judgment motion is a final and appealable order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “need not be filed within the time period for filing motions to alter or amend the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “collateral matters unrelated to the merits of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.