Hightower v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Douglas v. Alabama · Delaware v. Fensterer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... before a trial court is allowed to utilize a closed-circuit system of transmitting a child’s testimony into the courtroom, the court must hear evidence and make a case-specific determination that: First, [the] use of the ... procedure is necessary to protect the welfare of the ... child; Second ... the child witness would be traumatized, not by the courtroom generally, but by the presence of the defendant; and Third ... the emotional distress suffered by the child ... in the presence of the defendant is ... more than mere nervousness or excitement or some reluctance to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dufrene v. State“recognized the importance of protecting young children from the turmoil associated with having to give testimony in a courtroom and has acted to eliminate or alleviate that trauma within the parameters of the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rangel v. State“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rangel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.