State v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on Long v. State · State v. Moreno · Holland v. State · State v. Shoppers World, Inc. · Ex Parte McIver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The state is entitled to appeal an order of a court in a criminal case if the order: (5) grants a motion to suppress evidence, a confession, or an admission of jeopardy has not attached in the ease and if the prosecuting attorney certifies to the trial court that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay and that the evidence, confession, or admission is of substantial importance to the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Montalvo v. State“[T]he existence or non-existence of the particular intent of a statute may be inferred from the fact that an act does not contain a certain provision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. State“[T]he express mention or enumeration of one person, thing, consequence, or class is tantamount to an express exclusion of all others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.