Banther v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 district · 17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Arizona v. Fulminante · Irvin v. Dowd · Duncan v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial judge correctly noted that Banther had no right to have Schmitz assert his Fifth Amendment privilege before the jury.''); See also United States v. Martin, 526 F.2d 485, 487 (10th Cir.1975) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flonnory v. State“A person who is in possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony is guilty of possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Priest v. State“D.R.E. 106 does not make otherwise inadmissible evidence admissible,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.