Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 823 F.2d 1476 - Griffin v. Dugger

Griffin v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

823 F.2d 1476 · 1987

Citation profile

174
cited by 174 later decisions
4
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 174 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Alexander v. Fulton County (2000), Church v. City of Huntsville (1994)

42 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

68019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Bonner v. City of Prichard · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · O'Shea v. Littleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 174 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “each claim must be analyzed separately, and a claim cannot be asserted on behalf of a class unless at least one named plaintiff has suffered the injury that gives rise to that claim.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]ny analysis of class certification must begin with the issue of standing.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.