Bolling v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 165 · 1987
Citation profile
43 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably Rosler v. Derwinski (1991), Shendock v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (1990)
43 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 921
Relies on Arch Mineral Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor · Brauner v. McConnell · Akhenaton v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]ule 15(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, governing the review of agency orders, does not allow this court to accept the date that the letter/petition was received by the Board as the date for filing in this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[bjecause the motion to reconsider was not filed within the prescribed period, it did not toll the time for filing a petition for review in this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.