Bee v. Utah State Prison’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 397 · 1987
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2022
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Bounds v. Smith · Sloan v. Hicks · Rath Packing Co. Creditors' Trust v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur main concern here is 'protecting the ability of an inmate to prepare a petition or complaint....' ") (quoting Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 576, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2984, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974)); Love v. Summit County, 776 F.2d 908 , 914 (10th Cir.1985) ("The Supreme Court has never extended 'the Fourteenth Amendment due process claim based on access to the courts ... to apply further than protecting the ability of an inmate to prepare a petition or a complaint.' ") (alteration in original) (quoting Wolff, 418 U.S. at 576, 94 S.Ct. at 2984), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 814, 107 S.Ct. 66, 93 L.Ed.2d 25 (1986); Nordgren, 762 F.2d at 855. "Once an inmate gains access to the court through a properly prepared and filed initial pleading, the court will then be in a position to determine whether the claim has any merit and whether the issues raised are unusually complex.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carper v. DeLand“[W]e are persuaded that we should not hold that the right of access to the courts requires more than the assistance of counsel through completion of the complaint for a federal habeas or civil rights action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carper v. DeLand“district court may, in its discretion, appoint counsel for indigent inmates under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carper v. DeLand
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.