United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 4 · 1987
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Patriarca (1991), United States v. Millan (1993)
12 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Salerno · United States v. Martir · United States v. Claudio · United States v. Shakur · United States v. Salerno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure her appearance as required....,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person, including— (A) the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and (B) whether, at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under Federal, State, or local law; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“such failure is not necessarily reversible error if the record clearly supports the district court's ultimate conclusions”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.