Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

823 F.2d 546

Docket No. 87-7097

Brent v. Lyles

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 1987. Decided July 7, 1987.

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Robert James Cason v. James Rollins, Warden

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-07-07

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles E. Brent, appellant pro se.

Richard M. Kastendieck, Assistant Attorney General; Rex Charles Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Before HALL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Brent v. Lyles, C/A No. 86-2830 (D. Md., Mar. 23, 1987).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/823/f2d/546 · .json · Public domain