Holman v. Block’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 56 · 1987
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2009
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987)
Relies on Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Goldberg v. Kelly · Banks v. Block
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a household has no protectable property interest in the continuous entitlement to food stamps beyond the expiration of its certification period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress intended the statutory entitlement created by the amended Food Stamp Act and, by extension, the property interest of the recipients to be of a limited nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.