United States v. Oldaker’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 778 · 1987
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2010
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Rideout v. United States · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · United States v. Mauro · Gillette Co. v. Miner · United States v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hile a scheme to defraud furthered by separate mailings may properly be viewed as one unitary offense, the losses which resulted therefrom must be separately identified as those which occurred before and those which occurred after January 1, 1983 for purposes of restitution under the ... Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“offenses occurring after January 1, 1983”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.