Turshen v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 836 · 1987
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Varat Enterprises Inc First Union Commercial Corporation v. Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough (1996), Yadkin Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. McGee (1993)
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 701 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Katchen v. Landy · Segal v. Rochelle · Kokoszka v. Belford · Katchen v. Landy · Stassen for President Citizens Committee v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The normal rules of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to the decisions of bankruptcy courts.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.