Janikowski v. Bendix Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.2d 945 · 1987
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 14 Cal. 4th 479 - Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc. (1996), Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio Corporation (1989)
46 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Delaware State College v. Ricks · Raphan v. United States · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Zerman v. Melton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at least some significant showing of prejudice to the opponent.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be freely given when justice so requires”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he proper remedy for subjecting [an opponent] to duplicative discovery would be to require the amending party to bear a portion of the additional expense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.