Blackmon v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.3d 1088 · 2016
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Murray v. Carrier · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Schlup v. Delo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Felton v. Bartow“to grant relief, the state court's decision must be objectively unreasonable, not merely incorrect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rhodes v. Dittmann“the Schlup standard is demanding and permits review only in the extraordinary case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arnold v. Dittmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.