Lewis v. Epic Systems Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.3d 1147 · 2016
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Wisconsin Western District Court)
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 171 (§ 201 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer ... to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in [Section 7].” Id, § 158(a)(1). 5 .Section 2 of the NLGA declares, as”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the provision at issue is unlawful under Section 7 of the NLRA, it is illegal, and meets the criteria of the FAA's saving clause for nonenforcement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.