Rich v. Shrader’s Empirical Analysis
823 F.3d 1205 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on 14 Cal. 4th 479 - Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc. · Kaplan v. Rose · Allen v. City of Beverly Hills · Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc. · Murphy v. Inexco Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wide discretion in granting or refusing leave to amend after the first amendment, and only upon gross abuse will [its] rulings be disturbed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the primary purpose of the plan is to provide deferred compensation or other retirement benefits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“results in a deferral of income by employees.” The word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.