Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 823 F.3d 430 - United States v. Cotton

United States v. Cotton’s Empirical Analysis

823 F.3d 430 · 2016

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Tome v. United States · Youngblood v. West Virginia · United States v. Shoffner · United States v. Frazier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]se of a prior consistent statement to rehabilitate the credibility of a witness who has been impeached by a prior inconsistent statement is appropriate when the statement contextualizes, clarifies, or amplifies the meaning of the witness's testimony or inconsistent statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Error may be harmless where 'the government introduced ample competent evidence from which the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty even without the evidence that should have been excluded.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.