Amp Inc. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2012
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1121 (§ 39 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 35 U.S.C. § 284 · 35 U.S.C. § 285
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Foman v. Davis · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.