Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 823 F. Supp. 2d 13 - Daniel v. Fulwood

823 F. Supp. 2d 13 - Daniel v. Fulwood’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Wolff v. McDonnell · Erickson v. Pardus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Davis decision did not hold that the 1987 Regulations actually represented or codified the actual practice of the Board prior to their enactment.... [T]he D.C. Circuit has already held that the Davis decision is not binding on federal courts with respect to the question of whether the retroactive application of the 1987 Regulations violated the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the rule does not by its own terms show a significant risk, the respondent must demonstrate, by evidence drawn from the rule’s practical implementation by the agency charged with exercising discretion, that its retroactive application will result in a longer period of incarceration than under the earlier rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.